Don’t play with radon!

Our house, built into a slope and on a rock seam, also lies within a medium-high radon risk area, according to PHE/UKradon. A while back, I applied to UKradon for a home testing kit, which comprised three dosimeters: one for each floor. When the results came back in from the laboratory, some of my fears were confirmed. Ideally, levels should be below 100 (Bq/m³), but not exceed 200.

Our results were as follows:

  • Bedroom (top floor): 37
  • Living Room (ground floor): 85
  • Kitchen/diner: 290!

I suspected the source to be ground radon. The kitchen/diner and extension is built on a new slab with a gas-proof barrier (see earlier post). But, the undercroft beneath the original house simply has a concrete slurry cap (nominal 4in thick) poured on top of the subsoil – I believe the radon is permeating through this cap. The section below has been highlighted to show the suspected radon source (red):

Wishing to examine this further, I purchased a digital radon monitor, and recorded the weekly readings on the lower ground floor. To save you reading earlier posts, I should point out that I have an MVHR system, which usually operates at around 200 m³/hr, delivering an air change rate of around 0.5ach. After receiving the PHE results, I fitted an additional extract terminal  in the undercroft to help remove the radon (extract rate 30 m³/hr). The MVHR has a near perfect balance of <1%.  The chart presents the radon profile over the last 18-months (since fitting the extract in the undercroft):

Zones (A) represent normal operation of the MVHR, and, overall, I am reasonably happy with the radon levels (for the first two (A) sections). However, (B) shows a period where we go away on holiday for two weeks, and the MVHR is set to intermittently ventilate at a lower speed (average 0.1ach). I was somewhat alarmed to see the levels reach almost 600 Bq/m³ when we returned! The house was quickly purged for several hours (windows/doors), and was relieved to see the radon levels return to ‘normal’.

I also wished to check the effectiveness of the additional extract valve under the house, so, in December 2016, I blocked it over for approximately 4 months. The resulting increase in radon levels (measured in the adjacent kitchen/diner) is illustrated in area (C), and rise to around 280 Bq/m³ (i.e. returning to the levels found during the original PHE test). At the beginning of May 2017, the extract in the undercroft was uncovered, and the ventilation returned to its normal setting. It takes much longer to clear than I would have expected (getting on for six months), so the rate of extract is only just sufficient to deal with the decay rate that the radon is permeating into this space.

This post is to illustrate how ventilation can help to manage radon levels, but given the health risks associated with radon, I suggest you don’t play around (like I have!), but deal with it. Partly, the point of this monitoring, and this post, is to question whether we should we rely on ventilation for radon control? I suggest we should deal with the source: source control followed with dilution through ventilation is the principle to adopt. It’s not a job I’m looking forward too, but my plan is to use something like Newton 102 Nuseal to seal the capping in the undercroft – but will this liquid membrane introduce new chemicals into the home…? I’m happy to hear from you if you have any other ideas.

Some caveats:

  1. I believe that, coincidentally, the water table has risen in our area during the same time as this monitoring (I have noticed the capping in the undercroft is, in some areas, getting slightly damp). This is normal (particularly living on a slope), but the increasing hydro-static pressure underneath the house is likely to push out radon too(?). So, the radon levels illustrated, whilst clearly influenced by the ventilation rates, may be insufficient to control radon at times when the emission rate is higher.
  2. This is a case study, and it may not be representative. This post is intended as a discussion piece, not a guide for dealing with radon. Visit the PHE/UKradon website for further information on radon, home testing, and prevention measures.
  3. This post assumes external radon. Radon can also be present in aggregates used in construction materials. A balanced MVHR may be appropriate for such a scenario, but the evidence is not available (to my knowledge) at present.

This post will be updated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What is 11 + 10 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)